Realistic Evaluation
- Ray Pawson - University of Leeds, UK
- Nicholas Tilley - University College London, UK
June 1997 | 256 pages | SAGE Publications Ltd
Authors Ray Pawson and Nick Tilley show how program evaluation needs to be and can be bettered. The authors present a profound and highly readable critique of current evaluation practice introducing a manifesto- and handbook-fresh approach. This volume is devoted to articulating a new evaluation paradigm, which promises greater validity and utility for evaluation as a whole. Realistic Evaluation reflects the paradigmÆs foundation in scientific realist philosophy and its commitment to the idea that programs deal with real problems rather than mere social constructions. Its primary intention is to inform realistic developments in policyùmaking that benefit program participants and the public. Pawson and Tilley argue persuasively and passionately that scientific evaluation requires a careful blend of theory and method, quality and quantity, ambition and realism. The book offers a complete blueprint for evaluation activities, covering design to data collection and analysis to the accumulation of findings across programs and onto the realization of research into policy. Practical examples are used throughout this powerful volume and are grounded in the major fields of program evaluation.
Realistic Evaluation is essential reading for all those involved in the evaluation process, especially researchers, scholars, and students in sociology, social policy, criminology, health, and education.
A History of Evaluation
Out with the Old
In with the New
How To Design a Realistic Evaluation
How To Make Evaluations Cumulate
How To Construct Realistic Data
No Smoking without Firing Mechanisms
Evaluation, Policy and Practice
The New Rules of Realistic Evaluation
The book provides a really useful insight into evaluation and will be of use and interest to most students on the perspectives on social research course. I recommend it highly but given the breadth of topics on the course it should be considered supplementary reading, rather than recommended.
School of Applied Social Sciences, Durham University
February 10, 2010